Scam Alerts~20s briefing

Delhi HC: Rs 5.31 lakh scam credit still bars bail

What happened

The Delhi High Court denied anticipatory bail to Himanshu, whose Kotak Mahindra account received Rs 5.31 lakh from Waveland Comestible Pvt. Ltd. in a Rs 2.65 crore digital arrest fraud.

Why it matters

Any account that merely receives fraud money can now be named in the case, and the investigation follows the full route.

Remember this

A payment you never made is still your problem if it arrived in your account.

What is confirmed

The court treated the bank credit as a link in the fraud, not a debt that closes once the sum is returned.

  • Rs 2.65 crore was moved by the victim under digital arrest pressure.
  • Rs 1.50 crore went to Asif Enterprises and Rs 1.15 crore to Waveland Comestible Pvt. Ltd.
  • The Delhi High Court refused anticipatory bail and the CBI leads the probe.
Check sources ↓
More context & who is affected

A complainant was pressured by callers posing as TRAI, Mumbai Police and CBI officials to move Rs 2.65 crore during a digital arrest call.

Investigators traced Rs 1.50 crore to Asif Enterprises and Rs 1.15 crore to Waveland Comestible Pvt. Ltd.; Rs 5.31 lakh landed in Himanshu's Kotak Mahindra account on 14 May 2024.

The Delhi High Court dismissed his offer to deposit that balance, treating the credit as a link in the fraud rather than a settled debt, and ordered the entire money trail to be followed.

Total amount coerced
Rs 2.65 crore Moved by the complainant during the digital arrest call.Moneycontrol
Credited to the accused
Rs 5.31 lakh Reached the Kotak Mahindra account from Waveland Comestible Pvt. Ltd. on 14 May 2024.MoneycontrolLiveLaw
Traced corporate credits
Rs 2.65 crore Rs 1.50 crore to Asif Enterprises and Rs 1.15 crore to Waveland Comestible Pvt. Ltd.Moneycontrol

General Public

A bank credit that looks like an ordinary payment can now trigger an investigation rather than a welcome call.

General Public

With the CBI designated lead agency, dormant accounts used to move fraud money face scrutiny across India.

General Public

Impersonation of telecom and police officials remains the usual opening move in a digital arrest call.

Story updates 1

Key developments (1)

Follow-up events appended to this developing story

  1. Delhi Police probe journalists' harassment claims at Jantar Mantar protest

    Delhi Police refer three female journalists' harassment complaints to Crime Branch for enquiry after Jantar Mantar detentions.

    Source: DW

Reporting fromMoneycontrol β†—LiveLaw β†—

Sources & verification2 sources Β· 4 claims

These are the records behind this briefing. Linked reporting is not the same as independent confirmation.

  1. MoneycontrolReporting

    Digital arrest fraud case: what happens when scam money reaches one's bank account β†—

    Published Oct 3, 2026 Β· Accessed Oct 4, 2026
  2. LiveLawReporting

    Delhi High Court says tracing those who receive and dissipate funds is as important as identifying callers β†—

    Published Oct 3, 2026 Β· Accessed Oct 4, 2026

Claims and linked sources

Reported claim

The Delhi High Court denied anticipatory bail and refused to treat the matter as a simple Rs 5.31 lakh recovery.

Reported claim

Rs 5.31 lakh credited to Himanshu's Kotak Mahindra account from Waveland Comestible Pvt. Ltd. on 14 May 2024.

Reported claim

The complainant transferred Rs 2.65 crore after callers impersonated TRAI, Mumbai Police and CBI officials.

Interpretation

The bench said tracing those who receive and move the funds is as important as identifying the callers who pressed the victim.

Report an error or rights concern β†—

Next story~20s briefing

Punjab police recover rifles and grenades in border-state weapons bust

Read next story

Five stories. A clearer picture.

Take a breather, or carry on with the next five.

Back to the feed