Kya hua
Jaya Thakur ne 29 September, 2026 ko Chief Election Commissioner appointment law par 23 September ke split verdict ko chunauti dete hue ek curative petition file ki.
Mujhe kya farq padta hai
Agar yeh plea aage badhti hai, toh constitutional challenge ko ek bade bench ke paas bheja ja sakta hai, jabki 2023 ke panel change par vivaad jaari rahega.
Yaad rakh
Unki ladayi ab sirf kitabon mein likhe kanoon ke baare mein nahi hai; yeh is baare mein hai ki bench par kaun baitha hai.
Aur context aur kis par asar
Jaya Thakur ne 29 September, 2026 ko Supreme Court mein ek curative plea file ki hai, jo Chief Election Commissioner appointment law par 23 September ke split verdict ko target kar rahi hai.
Unka argument seedha bench par hai. Woh kehti hain ki "apprehension of bias" ki chinta Justice Satish Chandra Sharma par laagu hoti hai, jinke bete Madhya Pradesh High Court mein Election Commission ke standing counsel hain.
Yeh challenge 2023 ke us kanoon par hai jisne CJI ki jagah appointment panel mein ek Union Minister ko bithaya tha. 23 September ko bench bant gayi, aur maamla Chief Justice ke paas chala gaya. Thakur ka tark hai ki unke paas curative raasta hi bacha hai.
- Curative plea file hui
- 29 Sep 2026 CEC appointment law par 23 September, 2026 ke split verdict ke khilaaf file ki gayi.The Hindu
- Panel change
- Union Minister 2023 ke Act ne Chief Justice ki jagah appointment panel mein ek Union Minister ko bithaya.The Hindu
- 23 September ka verdict
- 2-1 split Datta ne Constitution Bench se inkaar kiya; Sharma ka maanna tha ki iski zaroorat hai, isliye maamla Chief Justice ke paas gaya.The Hindu
- Conflict cited
- MP High Court Siddharth Sharma Madhya Pradesh High Court mein Election Commission ke standing counsel hain.The HinduTimes of India
Yeh plea yahan tak kaise pahunchi
- 2023 — Act CEC appointment panel mein Chief Justice ki jagah ek Union Minister ko rakhta hai.
- 23 Sep 2026 — Division Bench banti hai; papers bade bench ke liye Chief Justice ke paas jaate hain.
- 29 Sep 2026 — Curative petition file hui, jisme Justice Sharma ke prati bias ki chinta jataayi gayi.
Aud Voters
Agar curative plea aage badhti hai toh 2023 CEC appointment panel ka standing badal sakta hai.
Aud Judiciary
Ek judge par bias ka objection is baat ko badal sakta hai ki kaun se bench is constitutional fight ko sunenge.
Aud Civic
Commission ki independence par nazar rakhne waale citizens ko is vivaad mein ek naya chapter mil gaya hai.
Is story ke updates 1
Key updates (1)
Is story ke aage ke updates — jaise protest, inquiry, verdict
-
Justice Nariman warns vote rights under threat after Bengal roll purge
Retired judge says 90 lakh Bengal voters were stripped of franchise; urges SC to fix commissioner appointments.
Source: LiveLaw
ReportingThe Hindu ↗Times of India ↗
Sources aur jaanch2 sources · 4 daave
Yeh is khabar ke source records hain. Source link hona apne aap mein independent confirmation nahi hai.
- The HinduReporting
Petitioner challenging CEC, ECI appointments law moves curative plea in Supreme Court ↗
Publish hua Sep 29, 2026 · Dekha gaya Oct 1, 2026 - Times of IndiaReporting
Citing SC judge son, curative plea against verdict on CEC & ECs appointment law ↗
Publish hua Sep 29, 2026 · Dekha gaya Oct 1, 2026
Daave aur unke sources
Jaya Thakur ne 29 September, 2026 ko Supreme Court mein ek curative petition file ki, jo CEC appointment law par 23 September ke split verdict ko chunauti de rahi hai.
Is plea mein Justice Satish Chandra Sharma ke prati bias ki chinta jataayi gayi hai, jinke bete Siddharth Sharma Madhya Pradesh High Court mein Election Commission ke standing counsel hain.
2023 ke Act ne CEC aur ECs ko chunne waale teen-sadasyiya panel mein Chief Justice of India ki jagah ek Union Minister ko rakh diya, jisse balance sarkar ki taraf jhuk gaya.
23 September ki Division Bench bant gayi: Justice Dipankar Datta ne maamle ko Constitution Bench ke paas bhejne se mana kar diya jabki Justice Sharma ka maanna tha ki iski zaroorat hai, isliye papers Chief Justice ke paas gaye.
